ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude: Ever since these synthetic intelligence (AI) chatbots have been launched, they’ve been often in contrast towards one another. Taking a look at them on the floor stage, you would possibly assume that there’s not so much separating these AI bots from each other. Nonetheless, a more in-depth inspection would let you know that every of them thrives in some particular duties, whereas struggling in others. So, in order for you one in every of these assistants to jot down an e mail for you, which one are you able to belief probably the most? How about picture technology?
On this article, we examine ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude throughout key on a regular basis use circumstances that will help you resolve which one suits your on a regular basis wants finest.
ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude: Writing Emails
E mail writing is an artwork. Used largely in workplace settings, the proper e mail is skilled but heat. It informs, and on the similar time, makes the data straightforward to learn and course of. It’s neither repetitive nor obscure, and neither ought to the tone come throughout as curt or impolite. With so many restrictions, it’s important to strike the appropriate steadiness.
So, we examined ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude with an e mail immediate that requires balancing info with sensitivity. If you would like to check the chatbots, you can even use these prompts to assessment the outcomes.
Immediate: Write an e mail to my boss explaining that I want a go away for 10 days (between September 1-10) as a result of I am getting married. Preserve it skilled however heat.
ChatGPT: The chatbot’s response was skilled and impartial, and didn’t concentrate on making the tone heat. Whereas it adopted the directions, it didn’t embrace info akin to getting ready a handover for the go away or explaining availability.
Gemini: Google’s chatbot managed to convey every part: the appropriate tone, all the required info, and readable paragraphs. The e-mail was quick however ample, and generally, acceptable.
E mail written by Claude
Claude: I might need made Gemini the winner if I had not learn Claude’s response. The chatbot considered info that I didn’t even contemplate, akin to briefing teammates on ongoing initiatives and establishing an out-of-office message. Even when it loses some factors for its overly formal tone, its structured output provides it a transparent edge.
Winner: Claude. (Gemini’s response would possibly work higher with an off-the-cuff supervisor.)
ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude: Summarisation
With solely restricted time in a day, you can not spend an hour going by a 40-page report or an evaluation. Typically, you want an AI assistant that may learn the content material and clarify what is going on on in a short paragraph or with just a few bullet factors. So, that is precisely what we examined these chatbots on.
Immediate: Summarise this text. (We shared a Phrase doc of one in every of our function tales. This one, should you had been curious.)
ChatGPT: The OpenAI chatbot summarised the 1,000-word article in about three to 4 paragraphs. It divided the paragraphs into completely different themes, making it simpler to course of whereas nonetheless having the ability to join one paragraph to a different.
Gemini: It summarised the article in a single paragraph. Whereas it did point out the key speaking factors, the presentation was too congested and never very readable. It additionally missed out on/glazed over some vital features.
Claude: Anthropic’s chatbot was probably the most organised in its presentation, however too prolonged to be thought-about a abstract. It additionally created a number of subheadings, which had been utterly pointless.
Winner: ChatGPT.
ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude: Picture Era
Whether or not you are making a presentation for work or making a undertaking for varsity, an image is certainly price a thousand phrases. So, this can be a important ability that separates a mean chatbot from vital. So, how did these chatbots carry out?
Immediate: A scenic purple home by a relaxed river, surrounded by tall inexperienced timber. The home encompasses a sloped roof and huge home windows, set inside a well-maintained entrance yard. The yard encompasses a vibrant flower nursery with blooming flowers in neat rows. A bicycle is mendacity casually on the driveway in entrance of the home. The setting is peaceable, with clear blue skies and delicate daylight filtering by the timber. The scene ought to evoke a relaxed, countryside appeal.
Claude: Regrettably, Claude doesn’t have picture technology capabilities, which is a disgrace, given it is 2025, and even the typical open-source chatbots, akin to Qwen, can generate images.
Gemini vs ChatGPT picture technology
ChatGPT: Our immediate deliberately included a lot of components. Oftentimes, chatbots are good at following one or two components in a picture, however no more than that. That’s the reason we had been shocked to see that ChatGPT was not solely capable of ship on each single instruction but in addition captured the essence of the image completely.
Gemini: Google’s chatbot was additionally capable of adhere to a lot of the directions, however not all. Nonetheless, in its defence, it did generate a extra sensible bicycle. Nonetheless, that was not sufficient to safe the win.
Winner: ChatGPT. Tell us should you really feel in a different way.
ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude: Conclusion
As a result of restricted testing time, it was not potential to check the chatbots on another parameters, akin to coding, internet search, conversations, and productiveness. Nonetheless, primarily based on what we might check and observe, ChatGPT wins the battle of chatbots and is the go-to for summarisation and picture technology duties. Nonetheless, in the case of e mail, Claude does excel.